Relationships
< Back to all relationship types
Label-Label relationship types
- business association (more)Forward link phrase: business association
Reverse link phrase: business association
Long link phrase: business association
Description: (none)
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: 0c1ff137-fca5-4148-82b7-8bce3c69165a
[ Documentation ]- label ownership (more)Forward link phrase: subsidiaries
Reverse link phrase: parent label
Long link phrase: is/was the parent label of
Description: This describes a situation where one label is (or was) a subsidiary of another label, during a given period of time. This should be used either to describe the fact a label is a subdivision of another one, or, through corporate acquisition of the former label, has become a subdivision of another one.
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: ab7a9be0-c060-4852-8f2e-4faf5b33231e
[ Documentation ] - label reissue (more)Forward link phrase: reissuing the catalog of
Reverse link phrase: catalog reissued by
Long link phrase: is/was reissuing the catalog of
Description: This describes a situation where one label is reissuing, under its own name, (part of) another label's catalog. This can happen in at least three cases:- A label acquires a lease on another label's catalog, for a period of time, in a specific region of the world.
- A label buys the rights to a defunct label's catalog, or buys a label (with its catalog) and dismantles it.
- A bootleg label reissues another label's catalog.
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: 1a502d1c-2c30-4efa-8cd7-39af664e3af8
[ Documentation ] - label rename (more)Forward link phrase: renamed into
Reverse link phrase: renamed from
Long link phrase: was renamed into
Description: This describes a situation where a label has changed its name, either for purely aesthetic reasons or following a buyout/sellout/spin-off. Extra care should be taken with cases where complicated merge/split/restructure financial operations are done. For example, it's not a good idea to rename the label Verve into The Verve Music Group, as Verve continued its existence thereafter as an imprint.
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: e6159066-6013-4d09-a2f8-bc473f21e89e
[ Documentation ] - label distribution (more)Forward link phrase: distributor for
Reverse link phrase: distributors
Long link phrase: is/was distributing the catalog of
Description: This describes a situation where one label is distributing (part of) another label's catalog, in a country/region of the world, during a period of time.
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: e0636054-32b7-4dd5-97a9-6e5664d443bc
[ Documentation ] - imprint (more)Forward link phrase: imprints
Reverse link phrase: imprint of
Long link phrase: has imprint
Description: This indicates that a record label (company) owns or has the right to use an imprint.
Cardinality of{entity0}: Few relationships (0)
Cardinality of{entity1}: Few relationships (0)
UUID: 23f8c592-006d-4214-9080-c4e5000c05d7
[ Documentation ]
- label ownership (more)